
"He wrote secret notes to people he hadn't met yet..." Brian Andreas




Claude Monet, The Houses of Parlament, Sunset, 1903
Henry Matisse, Open Window, Collioure, 1905
Before talking about things I saw there I want to say that the history of Plillips collection is close to a fairy tale. It is one of the rear cases when the passion and financial means accompanied each other, resulting in a marvelous collection of art works we enjoy today. Duncan Phillips, the founder of it, was interested in art from his early years. While studying in Yale he asked to include the course of the art history in the programme and thus created a whole new subject. He and his wife founded their collection at the dawn of the 20th century and spent their lives travelling and adding to it. They both referred to the experience of seeing art art as "joy-giving," and "life-enhancing" and the resulting collection is certainly reflects their attitude. The gallery gathered together works of established artists and those who were just coming onto the art scene. One of the crowning jewel of the collection is "The Luncheon of the Boating Party" by Renoir which was bought for $ 125.000 in 1923. (It is a pity that the records of the prices and the current values of the paintings are not available to public.) He was extremely proud of this acquisition. "Its fame is tremendous and people will travel thousands of miles to our house to see it...Such a picture creates a sensation wherever it goes."
I will return to my beloved Matisse though. This painting with closed window, below, was done forty three years after the one pictured above. He uses much stronger colours here, more determined brush strokes. If the first painting is luminous this one has an astonishing living force in it. I absolutely love the explosion of colours behind the glass, it reminds me of firework or looking through kaleidoscope. He once said that he felt by colour and this one is a hymn to it.

Henry Mattise, Interior with Egyptian Curtain, 1948
One more opened window, this time from Pierre Bonnard. Isn't it gorgeous? The shades of violet travel from the back of the chair in the lower right corner towards the sky, diagonal position of the window shatter brings a viewer back inside the room. The way the window is positioned towards the left side of the painting creates an interesting angle, as if somebody just entered the room and taking in a sleeping woman,a tiny black cat, a beautiful view. The open window was one of Bonnard's favourite themes, it gave him an opportunity to combine landscape and light with domestic interiors. It would be interesting to put together an exhibition that will show the open window motif done by different artists, it can be something truly fascinating. A room filled with paintings depicting this theme and one real opened window.
Pierre Bonnard, The Open Window,, 1921The last painting I am mentioning because it was a cause of my greatest surprise there. I haven't expected anything like that from this particular artist. The painting came to the Phillips collection as a gift, so it cannot stand as a testimonial of the founder's uncanny ability to detect brilliance, but it is there and it is the only presentation of this author. And, no, I am not going to tell you who it is.

Kenneth Snelson "Needle Tower", 1968
Another important work that could have been easily overlooked without my friends simply because of the sheer volume of the art works presented in the National Gallery, was Leonardo da Vinci's " Ginevra de' Benci" . It is remarkable because it it the only portrait by Leonardo in the Western Hemisphere, plus you can actually see the artist's fingerprint on the paint surface. It shows how the artist used his hand as well as a brush to blend colors and create soft, delicate edges.
Leonardo da Vinci " Ginevra de' Benci" c. 1474/1478.
These two works were new to me and piqued my intellectual curiosity, prompted me to read more about them but they didn't speak to my heart and soul. What I wanted to explore were the art works that attracted me without any knowledge of their background, their status in the art history. Writing art reviews I often notice that at times I grew to like some work after speaking with artists, exploring its meaning, but what I wanted was the instant spark, equivalent of being swept off my feet. So, below are the works that I felt connection with and things I learnt about them afterwards:
René Margitte “The Healer”, 1967
It s serenity and whimsy instantly attracted me. I love this bird cage in place of a torso, the absence of the face - it creates very poetic image of peaceful,singing soul. The statue "The Healer" is based on Margitte's painting with the same name. Towards the end of his life the artist worked on a series of sculptures based on eight of his paintings. He oversaw the making of full-scale wax models, but died before they were cast in bronze. The figure of the healer had reappeared in several works of the artist.In 1937, Magritte was photographed in the same pose, with a blanket over his head and a canvas in place of the cage.
I think that the most known painting of this author is "The Treachery of the Images" where he depicted a pipe with the words "This is not a pipe" (Ceci n'est pas une pipe) painted underneath it. Play of visual image and written words creates an interesting paradox, which summarizes Margritte's view on art: "Everything we see hides another thing, we always want to see what is hidden by what we see. "

A lot of LeWitt's works consist of basic shapes, colours and different types of lines that were organized by certain rules. It often took a whole team of assistants (who were always credited at the end) to execute his plans, which transformed a solo work into creative collaboration. LeWitt's titles/instructions are very detailed and the one to the Drawing # 65 said: "Lines not short, not straight, crossing and touching, drawn at random using four colors, uniformly dispensed with maximum density, covering the entire surface of the wall." The photo doesn't do justice to the drawing, you really have to see it in person in order to fully appreciate its intricate design.
Piet Mondrian "Tableau # IV, 1924/1925 (wall) and Constantin Brancusi "Bird in Space"
Those two are my old objects of fascination, they perfected the art of brevity, expressing maximum with minimum means. Brancusi's work , a slender projectiles, one from polished bronze, the other from polished marble, radiates splendid elegance. I had hard time to take my eyes off them. Their surface is so smooth, it glitters and seems to change shape ever so subtly as you move around. Brancusi was in a constant search for universal shape and perfect form and certainly created beautiful pieces on his way.
Piet Mondrian also went on a quest for simplicity, though his quest was a spiritual journey as well. He restricted himself to the most basic elements of painting - straight lines and primary colours and with this arsenal set on a difficult task of expressing the harmony of the universe. You would think that such limited means cannot provide much of variety, but he seemed to have limitless imagination. This was the first time I saw his diamond composition. This 45 degree turn of the painting is very captivating, it forces a viewer to consider how it would look from different angles, to notice cut off lines, and unfinished shapes.
It was brilliant to put those two masters in close proximity to each other, it creates certain dialogue between the pieces.
Bartolome Esteban Murillo "Two Women at a Window", 1665/1660
This is a very different work from a very different time. Bartolomé Esteban Murillo was the most popular Seville's painter in the later seventeenth century. What strikes me here is how modern are the faces of both women. It is the 17th century but they can easily be our contemporaries. It is such a lovely and lively composition - the amused smile of a young girl, who leans on the window ledge, the smile of the older women, hidden behind the shawl but visible in her eyes, you cannot help but smile back at them.
(to be continued)

